| Browse Analyst Notes by Company : A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All |
Following similar moves in Europe, the U.S. government will invest $250 billion in thousands of banks and issue a variety of guarantees in an attempt to get the credit markets flowing again. In the initial round, the government will invest in nine top U.S. banks. By investing in all the major banks, the U.S. government is not singling out what it thinks are the weaker players, aiding market acceptance. The government will continue to buy stakes in other banks that apply for the funding by Nov. 14.
According to reports, the government will invest $25 billion in Citigroup C, J.P. Morgan JPM, the about-to-be-combined Bank of America BAC and Merrill Lynch MER, and Wells Fargo WFC. Goldman Sachs GS and Morgan Stanley MS will receive $10 billion, while Bank of New York Mellon BK gets $3 billion and State Street STT takes on $2 billion--taking up about half of the $250 billion government investment. Overall, we think the government made the terms attractive enough for banks that didn't need the capital to take it. Our numbers suggest any changes in our fair value estimates will be minor.
In addition, the FDIC will guarantee most senior unsecured debt, including interbank lending, issued on or before June 30, 2009, for a maximum of three years for a 75-basis-point fee--a major initiative to bring down LIBOR and get the credit markets moving again. The FDIC will also remove the $250,000 limit on insurance for non-interest-bearing deposits, but will charge the banks a 10-basis-point fee for this new guarantee. This initiative is aimed at business accounts, which often use non-interest-bearing accounts in their daily cash management. Finally, the government is preventing the banks that use this facility from using certain tax credits on high management salaries. It also requires that new employment contracts do not include golden parachutes and imposes a clawback provision on upper management bonuses where financial statements were found to be materially misleading.